Global schedule reliability plateaus around the 65% mark - what it means for Aussie importers.
- The Cargo Confidential

- Oct 29
- 2 min read
If you were hoping schedule reliability would keep steadily climbing post-pandemic, the latest data just tapped the brakes. Global on-time vessel arrivals rose only 0.1 percentage points month-on-month to 65.2%, confirming what many of us suspected: reliability has officially plateaued in the mid-60s.
Yes, it’s the second-highest figure recorded since 2019 - but it also shows the industry has hit a ceiling (for now). The easy gains are gone.

What does 65% actually mean?
Only around two thirds of vessels are arriving within their scheduled window
The average delay for late arrivals is still sitting at around 4.88 days
Year-on-year, reliability is 14.7 percentage points higher, so we’ve recovered from the chaos - but improvement is now crawling, not sprinting
Translation: planning still needs a buffer, because “on time” is basically a 1-in-3 gamble.
Carrier performance – winners and laggers
Across the major players:
Carrier | Approx. Reliability |
Maersk | ~77% (industry leader) |
Hapag-Lloyd | ~74% |
Wan Hai | ~48% (bottom of the pack) |
If you’re booking with top-tier lines, you get better odds - still not perfection, but workable. Go further down the league table and you’re back in “roll the dice” territory.

Why this hits Australia differently
Even though 65% is a global average, it matters more here because:
Our lanes are longer → more ports, more touchpoints, more risk
Transhipment is common → every hop is a chance for delay
Retail lead times are tighter → miss your window and you lose the shelf
Opportunity cost hits hard → cashflow, storage, promo cycles… all shift
Australia doesn’t just feel delay — we compound it.
What smart operators should do now
This is the “plateau era,” not the “rapid recovery era.” So the winning play is proactivity not optimism.
Playbook for importers / supply chain leads:
Build delay into your planning assumptions
Ask your forwarder to show reliability by carrier, not just rate
Stretch your order cycle to allow a buffer where seasonal or high-turnover SKUs are involved
Use data, not hope, as your risk hedging tool
If you’re working on premium retail timelines → negotiate reliability first, price second
In short: stop planning like reliability is improving, and start planning like it’s static.
The Cargo Confidential take
Peak-season volatility isn’t the anomaly anymore - it’s the baseline. Mid-60% reliability is the new “normal,” which means resilience is now a strategy, not just a buzzword.
The operators who win in 2026 won’t be the ones with the cheapest freight - they’ll be the ones who anticipated disruption before it landed on the wharf.
Sources: Sea Intelligence






Comments